Full Text CEPIS/OPS/OMS

5.5. Field management practices in wastewater irrigation

5.5.1 Water Management
5.5.2 Land and Soil Management
5.5.3 Crop Management and Cultural Practices

Management of water, soil, crop and operational procedures, including precautions to protect farm workers, play an important role in the successful use of sewage effluent for irrigation.


5.5.1. Water Management

Most treated wastewater are not very saline, salinity levels usually ranging between 500 and 200 mg/l (EC}w = 0.7 to 3.0 dS/m). However, there may be instances where the salinity concentration exceeds the 2000 mg/l level. In any case, appropriate water management practices will have to be followed to prevent salinization, irrespective of whether the sald content in the wastewater is high or low. It is interesting to note that even the application of a non-saline wastewater, such as one containing 200 to 500 mg/l, when applied at a rate of 20,000 m{3 per hectare, a fairty typical irrigation rate, will add between 2 and 5 tonnes of salt annually so the soil. If this is not flushed out of the root zone by leaching and removed from the soil by effective drainage, salinity problems can build up rapidly. Leaching and drainage are thus two important water management practices to avoid salinization of soils.

Leaching

The concept of leaching has already been discussed. The question that arises is how much water should be used for leaching, i.e. what is the leaching requirement? To estimate the leaching requirement, both the salinity of the irrigation water (EC}w) and the crop tolerance to soil salinity (EC}e) must be known. The necessary leaching requirements (LR) can be estimated from Figure 14 for general crop rotations reported by Ayers and Westcot (FAO 1985). A more exact estimate of the leaching requirement for a particular crop can be obtained using the following equation:

             ECw
LR  =  ________________
        5 (ECe) -  ECw 
Where: LR = minimum leaching requirement needed to control salts within the tolerance (EC}e) of the crop with ordinary surface methods of irrigation.
ECw = salinity of the applied irrigation water in dS/m.
ECe = average soil salinity tolerated by the crop as measured on a soil saturation extract. It is recommended that the EC}e value that can be expected to result in at least a 90% or greater yield be used in the calculation.

Figure 14 was developed using EC}e values for the 90% yield potential. For water in the moderate to high salinity range (> 1.5 dS/m), it might be better to use the EC}e value for maximum yield potential (100%) since salinity control is critical in obtaining good yields. Further information on this is contained in Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29. Rev. 1 (FAO 1985). Where water is scarce and expensive, leaching practice should be designed to maximize crop production per unit volume of water applied, to meet both the consumptive use and leaching requirements. Depending on the salinity status, leaching can be carried out at each irrigation, each alternative irrigation or less frequently, such as seasonally or at even longer intervals, as necessary to keep the salinity in the soil below the threshold above which yield might be affected to an unacceptable level. With good quality irrigation water, the irrigation application level will almost always apply sufficient extra water to accomplish leaching. With high salinity irrigation water, meeting the leading requirement is difficult and requires large amounts of water. Rainfull must be considered in estimating the leaching requirement and in choosing the leaching method.

The following practices are suggested for increasing the efficiency of leaching and reducing the amount of water needed:

  1. leach during cool seasons instead of during warm periods, to increase the efficiency and ease of leaching, since the total annual crop water demand (ET, mm/year) losses are lower.
  2. use more salt-tolerant crops which require a lower leaching requirement (LR) and thus have a lower water demand.
  3. use tillage to slow overland water flow and reduce the number of surface cracks which by-pass flow through large pores and decrease leaching efficiency.
  4. use sprinkler irrigation at an application rate below the soil infiltration rate as this favours unsaturated flow, which is significantly more efficient for leaching than saturated flow. More irrigation time but less water is required than for continuous ponding.
  5. use alternate ponding and drying instead of continuous ponding as this is more efficient for leaching and uses less wwater, although the time required to leach is greater. This may have drawbacks in areas having a high water table, which allows secondary salinization between pondings.
  6. where possible, schedule leachings at periods of low crop water use or postpone leachings until after the cropping season.
  7. avoid fallow periods, particularly during hot summers, when rapid secondary soil salinization from high water tables can occur.
  8. if infiltration rates are low, consider pre-planting irrigations or off-season leaching to avoid excessive water applications during the crop season, and
  9. use one irrigation before the start of the rainy season if total rainfall is normally expected to be insufficient for a complete leaching. Rainfall is often the most efficient leaching method because it provides high quality water at relatively low rates of applications.

Drainage

Salinity problems in many irrigation projects in arid and semi-arid areas are associated with the presence of a shallow water table. The role of drainage in this context is to lower the water table to a desirable level, at which it does not contribute to the transport of salts to the root zone and the soil surface by capillarity. What is important is to maintain a downward movement of water through soils, van Schilfgaard (1984) reported that drainage criteria are frequently expressed in terms of critical water table depths; although this is a useful concept, prevention of salinization depends on the establishment, averaged over a period of time, of a downward flux of water. Another important element of the total drainage systems is its ability to transport the desired amount of drained water out of the irrigation scheme and dispose of it safely. Such disposal can pose a serious problem, particularly when the source of irrigation water is treated wastewater, depending on the composition of the drainage effluent.

Timing of irrigation

The timing of irrigation, including irrigation frequency, pre-planting irrigation and irrigation prior to a winter rainy season, can reduce the salinity hazard and avoid water stress between irrigations. Some of these practices are readily applicable to wastewater irrigation.

In terms of meeting the water needs of crops, increasing the frequency of irrigation will be desirable as it eliminates water stress between irrigations. However, from the point of view of overall water management, this may not always produce the desired results. For example, with border, basin and other flood irrigation methods, frequent irrigations may result in an unacceptable increase in the quantity of water applied, decrease in water use efficiency and larger amounts of may not result in decrease in water use efficiency and, indeed, could help to evercome the salinity problem associated with saline irrigation water.

Pre-planting irrigation is practised in many irrigation schemes for two reasons, namely: (i) to leach salts from the sol surface which may have accumulated during the previous cropping period and to provide a salt-free environment to germinating seeds (it should be noted that for most crops, the seed germination and seeding stages are most sensitive to salinity); and (ii) to provide adequate moisture to germinating seeds and young seedings. A common practice among growers of lettuce, tomatoes and other vegetable crops is to pre-irrigate the field before planting, since irrigation soon after planting could create local water stagnation and wet spots that are not desirable. Treated wastewater is a good source for pre-irrigation as it is normally not saline and the health hazards are practically nil.

Blending of wastewater with other water supplies

One of the options that may be available to farmers is the blending of treated sewage with conventional sources of water, canal water or ground water, if multiple sources are available. It is possible that a farmer may have saline ground water and, if he has non-saline treated wastewater, could blend the two sources to obtain a biended water of acceptable salinity level. Further, by blending, the microbial quality of the resulting mixture could be superior to that of the unbiended wastewater.

Alternative treated wastewater with other water sources

Another strategy is to use the treated wastewater alternately with the canal water or groundwater, instead of blending. From the point of view of salinity control, alternate applications of the two sources will be superior to blending. However, an alternating application strategy will require duel conveyance systems and availability of the effluent dictated by the alternate schedule of application.


5.5.2. Land and Soil Management

Several land and soil management practices can be adopted at the field level to overcome salinity, sodicity, toxicity and health hazards that might be associated with the use of treated wastewater.

Land development

During the early stages of on-farm land development, steps can be taken to minimize potential hazards that may result from the use of wastewater. These will have to be well planned, designed and executed since they are expensive and, often, one time operations. Their goal is to improve permanently existing land and soil conditions in order to make irrigation with wastewater easier. Typical activities include levelling of land to a given grade, establishing adequate drainage (both open and sub-surface systems), deep ploughing and leaching to reduce soil salinity.

Land grading

Land grading is important to achieve good uniformity of application from surface irrigation methods and acceptable irrigation efficiencies in general. If the wastewater is saline, it is very important that the irrigated land is appropriately graded. Salts accumulate in the high spots which have too little water infiltration and leaching, while in the low spots water accumulates, causing waterlogging and soil crusting.

Land grading is well accepted as an important farm practice in irrigated agriculture. Several methods are available to grade land to a desired slope. The slope required will vary with the irrigations system, length of run of water flow, soil type, and the design of the field. Recently, laser techniques have been applied to level land precisely so as to obtain high irrigation efficiencies and prevent salinization.

Deep cultivation

In certain areas, the soil is stratifield, and such soils are difficult to irrigate. Layers of clay, sand or hard pan is stratifield soils frequently impede or prevent free movement of water through and beyond the root zone. this will not only lead to saturation of the root zone but also to accumulation of salts in the root zone. Irrigation efficiency as well as water movement in the soil can be greatly enhanced by sub-soiling and chiselling of the land. The effects of sub-soiling and chiselling remain for about 1 to 5 years but, if long term effects are required, the land should be deep and slip ploughed. Deep or slip ploughing is costly and usually requires the growing of animal crops soon after to allow the settling of the land. Following a couple of grain crops, grading will be required to re-establish a proper grade to the land.


5.5.3 Crop Management and Cultural Practices

Several cultural and crop management practices that are valid under saline water use will be valid under wastewater use. these practices are aimed at preventing damage to crops caused by salt accumulation surrounding the plants and in the root zone and adjusting fertilizer and agrochemical applications to suit the quality of the wastewater and the crop.

Placement of seed

In most crops, seed germination is more seriously affected by soil salinity than other stages of development of a crop. The effects are pronounced in furrow-irrgated crops, where the water is fairly to highty saline. This is because water moves upwards by capillarity in the ridges, carrying salts with it. When water is either absorbed by roots or evaporated, salts are deposited in the ridges. Typically, the highest salt concentration occurs in the centre of the ridge, whereas the lowest concentration of salt is found along the shoulders of the ridges. An efficient means of overcoming this problem is to ensure that the soil around the germinating seeds is sufficiently low in salinity. Appropriate planting methods, ridge shapes and irrigation management can significantly decrease damage to germinating seeds. Some specific practices include:

  1. Planting on the shoulder of the ridge in the case of single row planting or on both shoulders in double row planting.
  2. Using sloping beds with seeds planted on the slopping side, but above the water line.
  3. Irrigating alternate rows so that the salts can be moved beyond the single seed row.

Figure 15 presents schermatic representations of salt accumulation, planting positions, ridge shapes and watering patterns.


Comentarios al Webmaster

[ Homepage CEPIS   ]